by Rand Herz

(via)
Tianjin is on fire.
At the center of the blaze is the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-City (SSTEC), a joint-venture between Singapore and China, which aims to herald a new era of sustainable urban development. The eco-city is part of a long-term goal to transform a 30-square-kilometer piece of previously underutilized urban land into a fully-functional urban enclave, and to spark the movement in China to ‘green’ its rampant industrialization.
SSTEC was the main topic of discussion at the recent “Tianjin Eco-city Cleantech Focus,” a three-day conference in September co-hosted by the eco-city’s investment and development company and the Cleantech Group, an industry leading market-intelligence firm. I attended the conference along with an eclectic assembly of international and Chinese businessmen in sustainable urban development industries. The conference, televised nationally in China, and in Tianjin, was by no means small beans. Heavyweight developers from across Asia threw in support and resources, including Chinese real estate giants Shimao, Vanke and Vantone; Mitsui Fudosan, Japanese real estate; Farglory, a Taiwanese real estate corporation; Keppel, a Singaporean marine group; Sunway, a Malaysian conglomerate; GEMS, a network of international schools; and Ayala, a Filipino conglomerate. Everyone came together to discuss ideas on a green economy, eco-city development theory and practices, urban technical integration in eco-cities, green corporate social responsibility and eco-city culture and spirituality.
As with many other eco-cities, SSTEC’s major challenge is in adapting a region previously unsuitable for a sustainable urban center into a fully-functional ecologically-responsible urban area. Prior to groundbreaking, the Tianjin port area was moderately-industrialized urban sprawl. Transforming a small part of this region into a low-carbon ecologically friendly urban zone is a monstrous task.
The catch lies in the blurry definition of what an eco-city actually is; what is appropriate, acceptable and ecologically responsible within a wide range of sustainability indicators? Globally, a question mark still hovers in clean technology circles over what is and what is not an eco-city. Indeed, how far must urban planners go in order to develop a metropolitan area with enough measures of sustainability to warrant recognition as an ecologically friendly area? The SSTEC is trying to tread this very wide line, to bridge the traditional urban industrial fossil-fuel-heavy model and the radically innovative concept of a zero carbon city. Unanimously, proponents of the SSTEC trumpet its green features, such as low household water consumption, large areas of public green space, and low per capita domestic waste generation. While the figures trumpeted by developers are by no means carbon neutral, and not nearly as high as expectations set by previous eco-city projects; their manageability make them attainable, and their presentation has made the entire Tianjin area incredibly sexy for investors and businesses looking to operate in the Bohai Economic Rim.
There are still issues though. At the Cleantech conference I spent a lot of time mining for detailed opinions from those present about “how” the SSTEC project would actually get built. I noticed a common thread of an apparent lack of action to much of the official discussions. Much time was spent in discussion of brilliant ideas, grand plans and the wonderful life everyone will have once construction is completed and residents move in. Painfully little was given to discussing what is going to happen, how it is going to happen, and who is going to do it.
Many see the SSTEC project as another in a long line of similar projects that have failed to meet expectations: Masdar in Abu Dhabi, Dongtan in the Yangtze Delta, Clonburris in Ireland. These cities all suffered from goals set too high and project managers lacking in technology and knowledge capital. They failed to meet deadlines and struggled to cope with the conversion of environments with low human carrying capacity to sustainable urban areas with high carrying capacity.
A minority of anonymous conference attendees expressed the heavily critical view that the SSTEC exists simply as a trendy method of attracting venture and development capital from the blossoming community of investors supporting projects focusing on sustainability and renewable energy. While this thought may or may not be running through the heads of the powers-that-be, green business is certainly commanding attention and investment in business circles around the world.
Following early September’s World Economic Forum meeting and the SSTEC conference, Tianjin is now set to host the United Nations Development Program’s climate conference, with expected attendance around 3000. While the successes and failures of eco-cities, and the SSTEC, have yet to be determined, the Bohai Economic Rim’s is all but written in the stars. With plans for the region’s economic outlook booked, Tianjin will certainly continue to be a hot growth region for the People’s Republic.
Rand Herz is a young American currently working at the University of Science and Technology of China in Hefei, Anhui as an English coach.
Related stories in the Worldchanging archives:
- A Climate-Neutral China | Alex Steffen, 28 Jun 10
- Is China Ready For Cap-and-Trade? | Cao Haili, 16 Dec 09
- Where are New Green Cities and How Can They Curb Asian Greenhouse Gas Emissions? | Warren Karlenzig, 14 Sep 09
- Will the Recession Derail China’s Slow Train to Sustainability? | Sam Geall 16 Jul 09
- China Begins Transition To A Clean-Energy Economy | Julian Wong, 10 Jun 09
Help us change the world – DONATE NOW!
(Posted by WorldChanging Team in Urban Design and Planning at 12:00 PM)




