On date 11/9/2010, New York Climate Action Council, release an interim report mentioning that as part of their mission 2050 to reduce greenhouses gases up to 80%, they are going to do following activities: (this is excerpt from the Interim Report)

During 2011, the Council will complete additional analyses and design of the policy options and transmit its recommendations in a Climate Action Plan. That plan will include the following:
• Economic assessments, including both the cost of inaction and macroeconomic impacts in New York, such as creating jobs and retaining some of the $38 billion dollars that is exported annually from New York to pay for energy imports
OV-4 New York State Climate Action Council
Interim Report 11-9-10
• Refinement of policy options based on public comment
• Assessment of policy interactions (reinforcement and conflicts) among individual policy
options; there are many such interactions, given the multi-sector nature of aggressive GHG mitigation policies
• Creation of a mitigation cost curve
(comparing net costs and reduction
potentials of individual climate policy
options)
• Assessment of the GHG reduction
potential of the full policy package, and
determining whether it puts New York on
the path to meet the 40 by 30 benchmark
target and the 80 by 50 long-term goal
• Further analysis of funding options and
availability of capital, as well as of
societal benefits and externalities.
Now, the only concern here is that, being a New Yorker tax payer for years and using all of the default energy consumption modes in new york, transport, gas, electricity, i wonder whether my tax payments are really helping to fund this project, if yes, where can i find the update on this, releasing an interim report, building policies without people concern would not going to help to reduce 80% of greenhouses gases in New York.
No offense but it’s not a Cliche`, it’s a reality.